Real-World Evidence of Health Outcomes Related to Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Brazil.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective option for patients with both early-stage and oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data from Latin America are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the real-world outcomes of applying SBRT for lung lesions in a Brazilian institution. METHODS: This study investigated a consecutive cohort of patients treated with SBRT for lung lesions (primary and metastasis). The study primary outcome was local control rates per lesion. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 216 patients received SBRT and were included in the study. The median follow-up was 24.5 months (5-70), primary NSCLC corresponded to 70% (n = 151) and nonprimary lung lesions to 30% (n = 65), respectively. Stage I NSCLC represented 56% (85 of 151) of the NSCLC cohort. The average number of fractions and total dose prescribed was 5 (3-10)/59 Gy (50-62 Gy). For stage I NSCLC (all lesions treated with a biologically effective dose [10] > 100 Gy), 2-year local control, OS, and PFS were 93.4%, 81.6%, and 80.7%, respectively. For stage IV lesions, if biologically effective dose (10) > 100 Gy or < 100 Gy, 2-year local control was 95.8/86.4% (P = .03), 2-year-OS was 81.6/60.5% (P = .006), and 2-year PFS was 38.9/17.9% (P = .10). Late toxicity was observed in 16.2% (n = 35) of the total cases. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that SBRT is effective (high local control and acceptable toxicity) for treating malignant lung lesions in a real-world scenario in Latin America.

Role of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Operable and Inoperable Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Radiation therapy is becoming an increasingly important part of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. Approximately 60% of all cancer patients require radiation therapy (RT) as part of their treatment. For lung cancer, this number is even higher, reaching approximately 77% of all patients, from radical to palliative modalities of RT. This percentage may even be underestimated, as it may not account for the more recent use of RT in oligometastatic lung cancer patients. Thus, we can estimate that each year there will be approximately 21,890 new lung cancer patients in the USA requiring RT. These numbers are expected to continue to rise, as lung cancer radiation techniques continue to improve. There is growing interest in determining the best treatment options for early-stage NSCLC patients. There is well-established data showing the benefit of RT for inoperable patients, and more recent encouraging data even in operable patients.

Access of Patients With Lung Cancer to High Technology Radiation Therapy in Brazil.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer is a global health problem, with more than 220,000 new cases and 150,000 deaths per year in the United States. Likewise, in Brazil, lung cancer is the most lethal cancer with 30,200 new cases expected in 2020. Regarding treatment types, radiation therapy (RT) represents an important approach, since 60%-70% of the patients will receive this modality of treatment during the course of their disease. However, access to RT remains challenging because of the socioeconomic inequalities in the Brazilian population, where approximately 100,000 patients/year die without access to RT. This work provides an overview on the availability of high technology RT in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the Brazilian Radiotherapy Census, local public and private databases, and the current literature published in 2019. RESULTS: The Brazilian radiotherapy network relies on approximately 363 linear accelerators and 20 cobalt machines that remain operational. Most of these machines are installed at public health facilities. Regarding high technology, intensity-modulated RT is available in 53.7% (n = 130) and volumetric modulated arc therapy in 28.5% (n = 69) of the institutions, although only 19.8% (n = 48) of those facilities are capable of performing image-guided RT using cone beam computed tomography. Considering only the public health care system, the scenario is more restricted, with 40.1% (n = 65) of the institutions offering intensity-modulated RT, 21% (n = 34) volumetric modulated arc therapy, and 14.8% (n = 24) using cone beam computed tomography. Because of these scare resources, only 16% of Radiation Departments offer stereotactic body RT. CONCLUSION: Brazil still needs to improve and provide high and safer RT technologies to patients with lung cancer across all Brazilian regions to attend the population needs and obtain better patient outcomes.

Lung Cancer and the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the Brazilian Thoracic Oncology Group.

New cases of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continue to rise worldwide following the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). The current pandemic has completely altered the workflow of health services worldwide. However, even during this critical period, patients with other diseases, like cancer, need to be properly treated. A few reports have shown that mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 is higher in elderly patients and those with other active comorbidities, including cancer. Patients with lung cancer are at risk of pulmonary complications from COVID-19, and as such, the risk/benefit ratio of local and systemic anticancer treatment has to be considered. For each patient, several factors, including age, comorbidities, and immunosuppression, as well as the number of hospital visits for treatment, can influence this risk. The number of cases is rising exponentially in Brazil, and it is important to consider the local characteristics when approaching the pandemic. In this regard, the Brazilian Thoracic Oncology Group has developed recommendations to guide decisions in lung cancer treatment during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Due to the scarcity of relevant data, discussions based on disease stage, evaluation of surgical treatment, radiotherapy techniques, systemic therapy, follow-up, and supportive care were carried out, and specific suggestions issued. All recommendations seek to reduce contagion risk by decreasing the number of medical visits and hospitalization, and in the case of immunosuppression, by adapting treatment schemes when possible. This statement should be adjusted according to the reality of each service, and can be revised as new data become available.

Does the Sequence of Anthracycline and Taxane Matter? The NeoSAMBA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Taxanes usually follow anthracyclines in breast cancer neo/adjuvant treatment, likely because of their later introduction into clinical practice. However, there is no biological rationale that justifies this current standard of care. We compared a taxane followed by an anthracycline-based regimen with the reverse sequence in the neoadjuvant setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, single-center phase II trial, women with inoperable, locally advanced, HER2-negative breast cancer were stratified by hormone receptor status and randomized to three cycles of docetaxel (T) followed by three cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus three cycles of FAC followed by three cycles of docetaxel. Surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy were administered as per local guidelines. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints included toxicity, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Treatment sequence did not improve pCR, which was 7% with T-FAC and 3% with FAC-T. However, after a median follow-up of 79 months, the 5-year EFS rate was 75.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4%-87.7%) with T-FAC and 48.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-62.7%) with FAC-T (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81; log-rank p = .0054), and the 5-year OS rate was 89.7% (95% CI, 82.2%-97.8%) with T-FAC and 64.7% (95% CI, 53.6%-78.1%) with FAC-T (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; p = .0052). There were no unexpected toxicities. CONCLUSION: We showed for the first time an improvement in EFS and OS with taxane-first compared with anthracycline-first sequencing chemotherapy in HER2-negative, locally advanced breast cancer. Confirmation of these results may have implications for clinical practice. This trial was registered with Clinicatrials.gov identifier NCT01270373. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The NeoSAMBA trial showed a benefit for taxane-first sequencing chemotherapy consistent with the systematic review of the literature as well as the larger Neo-tAnGo study. Many recent and current ongoing clinical trials have already followed this treatment strategy. As a taxane-before-anthracycline sequence carries neither an incremental cost nor an increased toxicity, and given the available literature on this issue, reinforced that taxane-first regimen can be easily incorporated into daily clinical practice while awaiting confirmation of these findings from larger trials.

Lung cancer and the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations from the brazilian thoracic oncology group

New cases of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continue to rise worldwide following the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). The current pandemic has completely altered the workflow of health services worldwide. However, even during this critical period, patients with other diseases, like cancer, need to be properly treated. A few reports have shown that mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 is higher in elderly patients and those with other active comorbidities, including cancer. Patients with lung cancer are at risk of pulmonary complications from COVID-19, and as such, the risk/benefit ratio of local and systemic anticancer treatment has to be considered. For each patient, several factors, including age, comorbidities, and immunosuppression, as well as the number of hospital visits for treatment, can influence this risk. The number of cases is rising exponentially in Brazil, and it is important to consider the local characteristics when approaching the pandemic. In this regard, the Brazilian Thoracic Oncology Group has developed recommendations to guide decisions in lung cancer treatment during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Due to the scarcity of relevant data, discussions based on disease stage, evaluation of surgical treatment, radiotherapy techniques, systemic therapy, follow-up, and supportive care were carried out, and specific suggestions issued. All recommendations seek to reduce contagion risk by decreasing the number of medical visits and hospitalization, and in the case of immunosuppression, by adapting treatment schemes when possible. This statement should be adjusted according to the reality of each service, and can be revised as new data become available.

Phase 1 study of cetuximab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced anal canal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the feasibility and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of cetuximab with chemoradiotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CP) in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma. METHODS: Cetuximab was administered on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43, and 50 (400 mg/m(2) initial dose, then 250 mg/m(2) /week) concurrent with total dose radiation of 55 to 59 Gy, both starting on day 1. Escalating doses of 5-FU (96-hour infusion) and CP (2-hour infusion), both on days 1 and 29, were administered according to the following design: starting dose level (0) 5-FU/CP = 800/60 mg/m(2) /day and up to dose level (+2) 5-FU/CP = 1000/80 mg/m(2) /day. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events (uncontrolled diarrhea or febrile neutropenia) occurred in 3 of 14 assessable patients receiving escalated dose of 5-FU/CP, with 1 in dose level (0) and 2 in dose level (+2). The RP2D was 5-FU/CP = 800/80 mg/m(2) /day. Because of unexpected non-DLT treatment-related grade 3 (G3) adverse events (AEs) such as thrombosis/embolism, syncope, and infection occurring in ≥ 20% of patients, a safety expansion cohort with an additional 9 patients was investigated with the RP2D. The most frequent G3/G4 AEs evaluated in 23 patients were radiation dermatitis (12 patients), diarrhea (10 patients), thrombosis/embolism (6 patients), and infection (5 patients). The study was closed due to these severe AEs, although no G5 AEs occurred. Twenty of 21 patients (95%) achieved pathological complete response at primary tumor. With a median follow-up of 43.4 months, the 3-year locoregional control rate was 64.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab could not be integrated with chemoradiotherapy-cisplatin-based therapy due to the high toxicity rate. However, efficacy is encouraging and further investigation of an epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted agent (other than cetuximab) concurrent with chemoradiation should be pursued.